Vanishing Submissives

Maxxim · Jun 25, 2009

I have met a few submissives here but have had the misfortune to find those that do not have the desire to truly be subservient. They have served for anywhere from a day to a month, but the end result is that they suddenly go quiet. They do not bother to tell me if they've found a new master, don't want to serve any more or what the case may be. I don't punish them more than normal and take care to make sure they know that I will listen to them if they have problems carrying out a task. Yet I do not receive the same consideration when it comes to them deciding to break off contact. Frankly, this annoys me to no end.

The question I have is how many others have experienced this and have you discovered a way to minimize this?

subspace · Jun 25, 2009

Could it be that the M/s relationship moved to fast? or...

What could really be the issue is that they weren't truly submissives but 'visitors' trying to get a taste.

Maxxim · Jun 25, 2009

I do not know. I've been very careful, moving slowly, not forcing myself deeper into their lives. I respect the limits they set and try to focus on the aspects of BDSM that they enjoy. I have been told by a few former submissives that I can be scary as the sub realizes she is becoming 'addicted' to what I do to her.

Martello · Jun 25, 2009

Subservient and Submissive are pretty different. Maybe that has a little somehting to do with it?

Maxxim · Jun 25, 2009

Slave and Submissive are not exactly interchangeable, but a submissive and slave are both subservient to their masters otherwise they would not qualify for the terms.

That doesn't mean that they are not a person and still to be treated properly. It simply means that they bow to your wishes unless it would violate their limits or cause them harm.

Martello · Jun 25, 2009

For me, I'm only intrested in "bedroom" Subs, so subservient doesn't really fly. I like woman with her own mind opinion but when the bedroom door is closed things are a little different.

That's where I was coming from on that. I think there is a world of difference between the two terms.

Maxxim · Jun 25, 2009

Definitely there are differences there. I'm usually careful to ask them which they are. If they don't know, I try to help them find out. I do make it clear from the beginning what I expect though, even before I begin training or playing.

EZRA · Jun 25, 2009

also remember subs hate conflict and may prefer to disappear than try and explain themselves.
but I also think subspace has a point many may just be" testing the waters"
How many romance novels have the MAN" taking her forcefully into his arms" sorta thing, for many the idea of being dominated sounds better than it actually is or is different than they thought it would be so they just disappear than hafe to admit they were wrong about what they wanted.

Just a thought.

Maxxim · Jun 25, 2009

Truthfully, I've thought of most of it, but I wanted to rant a bit. It getrs really frustrating when you put alot of effort into a girl then she just disappears. It makes you not want to waste time investing in another sub. I know that that would not be right though...

stripped · Jul 11, 2009

There is a spectral difference between a real sm relationship, and a role play / recreational sm relationship. If it's recreational, and they split, don't sweat it. If you were taking it seriously, and they split, they answer to their real master, and you did too. (no offense intended, of course) This latter scenario would mean that you take into consideration that you lost these girls for whatever reason(s), and evaluate each situation in order to grow and strengthen as a dominant. If it is a weekend thing for you, then who cares, its the same as losing past girlfriends.

Vanishing Submissives

Maxxim

New Member

subspace

Member

Maxxim

New Member

Martello

Member

Maxxim

New Member

Martello

Member

Maxxim

New Member

EZRA

Member

Maxxim

New Member

stripped

New Member

Similar threads