Let's Define Pornography!

Free LIFE TIME Fileboom Premium

JettOnly

Member

MIRROR: Download from MEGA

What if someone has a fettish that is statues? and the statue was created for the sole porpose of turning people on?
What about a photograph of a shoe? A shoe and foot? a lady with the same shoe on - are they all porn or none or just some?

What if the written work was a true story of someone exploiting someone else? Or how about a thread on a forum created for the OP to get off on (he would be then exploiting the other forum members)
As a female I can say a well written story is MUCH better than some image for me

Personaly I would say erotica CAN be porn to some people, just as some porn is going to be distasteful to other people

It is interesting how different everyones views are tho :)
 
Fileboom Premium Account

Keep2share Premium PRO Account
Free LIFE TIME Fileboom Premium

Kor

Member

MIRROR: Download from MEGA

The concept of "pornography" is fairly recent and localized - the British Commonwealth and USA from a century and a half ago, more or less. Within those areas there are wide legal interpretations of what constitutes pornography.

Pornography laws seldom make logical sense. For example, an image of a naked woman is "art" if it's displayed in a public gallery; the same image in a slick magazine may be "pornography."


Boiling things down to essentials, the concept of "pornography" appears to be some people seeing other people doing something enjoyable, therefore they must be prevented from doing so.
 
Fileboom Premium Account

Keep2share Premium PRO Account
Free LIFE TIME Fileboom Premium
Free LIFE TIME Fileboom Premium
Free LIFE TIME Fileboom Premium
Free LIFE TIME Fileboom Premium

TerribleT

Member

MIRROR: Download from MEGA

Oh, so you're in the 'porn is exploitative' camp? Interesting.

I highly disagree, and many other people who write it are constantly drawing lines between porn, erotica, smut, etc

I don't mean to imply that exploitation is necessarily bad.
I consider myself neutral in the porn debate. As a pseudo visual artist I am, however, hopelessly biased. Porn must be a visual representation of real people. Otherwise, it's erotica.
 
Fileboom Premium Account

Keep2share Premium PRO Account
Free LIFE TIME Fileboom Premium

Smallest

Moderator

MIRROR: Download from MEGA

The writer's argument is usually:
Porn- Gratuitous sex written for fulfillment of the reader. There's just sex and fun
Erotica- A sexual journey, where sex is a way of highlighting the rest of the story and developing characters, but sex is still written explicitly and for fulfillment (so, porn + plot). Doesn't need to be romance or have a happy ending
Romantica- Romance with erotic elements, usually less explicit in depiction. Chick books, basically
And the rest of the spectrum doesn't really matter. And when I called erotica porn+plot, I of course meant the definition of porn given there, not any of the others I or anyone else in this thread has stated.

I don't understand why being a visual artist makes you more inclined to disagree. I mean, I write, but I don't think that's why I classify some writing as porn.

Also, how do you define exploitative, then? Not meant argumentatively, but it'll help me get where you're coming from.
 
Fileboom Premium Account

Keep2share Premium PRO Account
Free LIFE TIME Fileboom Premium

TerribleT

Member

MIRROR: Download from MEGA

I don't understand why being a visual artist makes you more inclined to disagree. I mean, I write, but I don't think that's why I classify some writing as porn.

Also, how do you define exploitative, then? Not meant argumentatively, but it'll help me get where you're coming from.

I'm not disagreeing, per se, but i have my own definition based on what comes to my mind at the suggestion of pornography. The word, to me, means to record an actual erotic event.
To exploit, in this context, means simply to use for ones self.
 
Fileboom Premium Account

Keep2share Premium PRO Account
Top